Awake Intubation Decision
Support clinical decision-making for awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) when difficult airway risk may make induction unsafe. Evaluate intubation difficulty, ventilation rescue, obstruction, and consequences of failure.
Based on: DAS 2019 · ASA 2022
Input
Overview
Structured decision support for when awake intubation warrants active consideration. Evaluates four domains — intubation difficulty, ventilation rescue, airway patency, and consequence of failure — to assess whether induction may remove the margin of airway safety.
Evidence Summary
Awake intubation as a strategy
Awake intubation is not chosen because the airway is difficult in isolation. It is chosen when induction may remove the margin of safety — when losing the airway after induction could result in a situation that cannot be rescued. DAS 2019 and ASA 2022 position awake techniques as a primary strategy in high-risk airways, not only a fallback.
- Four key domains determine whether induction is safe: intubation difficulty, ventilation rescue, airway patency, and physiologic consequence
- High concern triggers: active obstruction, previous failed intubation, high difficulty combined with poor rescue or critical physiology
- A single high-concern trigger is sufficient to make awake intubation the preferred strategy
- Intermediate concern does not mandate awake intubation — it warrants explicit team discussion