Wells Score for Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Calculate Wells Score for pulmonary embolism (PE). Estimate pretest probability and guide the decision between D-dimer testing and CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).
Based on: Wells 2000
Input
Clinical reasoning
A 62-year-old man presents with sudden dyspnea 4 days after total knee replacement. HR 106/min. No DVT signs.
What is the next best step?
A 45-year-old woman presents with pleuritic chest pain. HR 82/min, no recent surgery, no DVT signs, no hemoptysis, no malignancy, no prior DVT/PE. Pleuritis seems more likely than PE.
What is the next best step?
Overview
Wells Score for pretest probability assessment of pulmonary embolism (PE). Three-tier risk classification guides the D-dimer versus CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) decision.
Evidence Summary
The Wells Score was developed by Wells et al. (2000) as a validated clinical prediction rule for PE pretest probability. The criterion 'PE more likely than alternative diagnosis' is the most subjective component, requiring clinical gestalt — the clinician must weigh the entire clinical picture against competing diagnoses.
The three-tier classification (low, moderate, high) guides the selection between D-dimer testing and imaging. At low probability, a highly sensitive D-dimer negative result may exclude PE. At high probability, D-dimer adds no diagnostic value, and CTPA should be performed without delay.
| Score | Risk category | PE probability (Wells 2000) | Recommended approach |
|---|---|---|---|
| < 2 | Low | ≈10% | D-dimer testing |
| 2–6 | Moderate | ≈28% | D-dimer or CTPA |
| > 6 | High | ≈66% | Direct CTPA |